[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9=qXn2xqra1hDRcKTkuQn421_mXyaBCQBuFO4HqmtLYOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 08:43:03 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printf: convert test_hashed into macro
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 11:39 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 11:10:08AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > This allows the compiler to check the arguments against the __printf()
> > attribute on __test(). This produces better diagnostics when incorrect
> > inputs are passed.
>
> Seems there is a consensus about this version, FWIW,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks Andy. Anything further required before this can be taken through printk?
Cheers,
Tamir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists