[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a000e6a2fcdfb6dc8d18e24d6ee1e7f9f89bc0e.camel@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:25:51 +0000
From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>
CC: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "donald.hunter@...il.com" <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "leon@...nel.org"
<leon@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, "jiri@...nulli.us"
<jiri@...nulli.us>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko
<jiri@...dia.com>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "rdunlap@...radead.org"
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Gal Pressman
<gal@...dia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>, "krzk@...nel.org"
<krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V6 07/14] devlink: Add parent dev to devlink API
On Tue, 2026-01-27 at 13:49 +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
> >
> > Upcoming changes to the rate commands need the parent devlink
> > specified.
> > This change adds a nested 'parent-dev' attribute to the API and
> > helpers
> > to obtain and put a reference to the parent devlink instance in
> > info->user_ptr[1].
> >
> > To avoid deadlocks, the parent devlink is unlocked before obtaining
> > the
> > main devlink instance that is the target of the request.
> > A reference to the parent is kept until the end of the request to
> > avoid
> > it suddenly disappearing.
> >
> > This means that this reference is of limited use without additional
> > protection.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
>
> ...
>
> Hi Cosmin, all,
>
> The netlink_gen.[ch] and spec changes in this patch do not seem
> consistent.
>
> $ tools/net/ynl/ynl-regen.sh -f
> $ git diff
> diff --git a/net/devlink/netlink_gen.c b/net/devlink/netlink_gen.c
> index 6b691bdbf037..f4c61c2b4f22 100644
> --- a/net/devlink/netlink_gen.c
> +++ b/net/devlink/netlink_gen.c
> @@ -39,11 +39,6 @@ devlink_attr_param_type_validate(const struct
> nlattr *attr,
> }
>
> /* Common nested types */
> -const struct nla_policy
> devlink_dl_parent_dev_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_DEV_NAME + 1] = {
> - [DEVLINK_ATTR_BUS_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
> - [DEVLINK_ATTR_DEV_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING, },
> -};
> -
> const struct nla_policy
> devlink_dl_port_function_nl_policy[DEVLINK_PORT_FN_ATTR_CAPS + 1] = {
> [DEVLINK_PORT_FUNCTION_ATTR_HW_ADDR] = { .type = NLA_BINARY,
> },
> [DEVLINK_PORT_FN_ATTR_STATE] = NLA_POLICY_MAX(NLA_U8, 1),
> diff --git a/net/devlink/netlink_gen.h b/net/devlink/netlink_gen.h
> index d4db82a00522..2817d53a0eba 100644
> --- a/net/devlink/netlink_gen.h
> +++ b/net/devlink/netlink_gen.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
> #include <uapi/linux/devlink.h>
>
> /* Common nested types */
> -extern const struct nla_policy
> devlink_dl_parent_dev_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_DEV_NAME + 1];
> extern const struct nla_policy
> devlink_dl_port_function_nl_policy[DEVLINK_PORT_FN_ATTR_CAPS + 1];
> extern const struct nla_policy
> devlink_dl_rate_tc_bws_nl_policy[DEVLINK_RATE_TC_ATTR_BW + 1];
> extern const struct nla_policy
> devlink_dl_selftest_id_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_ID_FLASH + 1];
> @@ -30,19 +29,12 @@ int devlink_nl_pre_doit_dev_lock(const struct
> genl_split_ops *ops,
> int devlink_nl_pre_doit_port_optional(const struct genl_split_ops
> *ops,
> struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct genl_info *info);
> -int devlink_nl_pre_doit_parent_dev_optional(const struct
> genl_split_ops *ops,
> - struct sk_buff *skb,
> - struct genl_info *info);
> void
> devlink_nl_post_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct
> sk_buff *skb,
> struct genl_info *info);
> void
> devlink_nl_post_doit_dev_lock(const struct genl_split_ops *ops,
> struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info
> *info);
> -void
> -devlink_nl_post_doit_parent_dev_optional(const struct genl_split_ops
> *ops,
> - struct sk_buff *skb,
> - struct genl_info *info);
>
> int devlink_nl_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info
> *info);
> int devlink_nl_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> netlink_callback *cb);
> ;
Hi Simon,
We had this conversation during v4, I replied then [1].
But thinking about it a bit more, I think it's indeed slightly cleaner
to move the policy and the new pre/post doit handlers to the next
patch, where they are actually used. The only bit is that the policy is
used from devlink_get_parent_from_attrs_lock from this function, but it
appears safe to use NULL there until next patch (the underlying parse
functions tolerate NULL policies).
So I'll do that in the next submission.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/3ec956ea1d0a1c6e56865b2ded6d83ed773ccd4d.camel@nvidia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists