[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXjPf_fIWX74YVWD@thinkstation>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:51:43 +0000
From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>,
Frank van der Linden <fvdl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 09/14] mm/hugetlb: Remove fake head pages
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 03:00:03PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > + if (pfn)
> > + return pfn_to_page(pfn);
> > +
> > + tail = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, 0);
> > + if (!tail)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + p = page_to_virt(tail);
> > + for (int i = 0; i < PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page); i++)
> > + prep_compound_tail(p + i, NULL, order);
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>
> hugetlb_lock is considered a contended lock, better not to abuse it.
> cmpxchg() is enought in this case.
We hit the lock once per node (excluding races). Its contribution to the
lock contention is negligible. spin_lock() is easier to follow. I will
keep it.
Ack for the rest of your comments.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists