[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127150450.2073236-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 23:04:50 +0800
From: alexjlzheng@...il.com
To: oleg@...hat.com,
usamaarif642@...il.com,
david@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
alexjlzheng@...cent.com,
mingo@...nel.org,
ruippan@...cent.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] procfs: fix missing RCU protection when reading real_parent in do_task_stat()
From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>
When reading /proc/[pid]/stat, do_task_stat() accesses task->real_parent
without proper RCU protection, which leads:
cpu 0 cpu 1
----- -----
do_task_stat
var = task->real_parent
release_task
call_rcu(delayed_put_task_struct)
task_tgid_nr_ns(var)
rcu_read_lock <--- Too late!
task_pid_ptr <--- UAF!
rcu_read_unlock
This fix adds proper RCU protection similar to getppid() in kernel/sys.c
which correctly uses rcu_dereference() when accessing current->real_parent.
Fixes: 06fffb1267c9 ("do_task_stat: don't take rcu_read_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>
---
fs/proc/array.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 42932f88141a..3c2eea2c551a 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -528,7 +528,9 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
}
sid = task_session_nr_ns(task, ns);
- ppid = task_tgid_nr_ns(task->real_parent, ns);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ppid = task_tgid_nr_ns(rcu_dereference(task->real_parent), ns);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
pgid = task_pgrp_nr_ns(task, ns);
unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
--
2.39.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists