linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] ACPI: CPPC: Clean up cppc_perf_caps and cppc_perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i-fgbpfd-iHcNNtnFU79Whs+Maknx3ou4oNOADzAZmxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:27:07 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, pierre.gondois@....com, 
	zhenglifeng1@...wei.com, ionela.voinescu@....com, lenb@...nel.org, 
	robert.moore@...el.com, corbet@....net, rdunlap@...radead.org, 
	ray.huang@....com, gautham.shenoy@....com, mario.limonciello@....com, 
	perry.yuan@....com, zhanjie9@...ilicon.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, treding@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, 
	vsethi@...dia.com, ksitaraman@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com, 
	nhartman@...dia.com, bbasu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] ACPI: CPPC: Clean up cppc_perf_caps and
 cppc_perf_ctrls structs

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 3:57 PM Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> - Remove redundant energy_perf field from 'struct cppc_perf_caps' as
>   the same is available in 'struct cppc_perf_ctrls' which is used.
> - Move the 'auto_sel' field from 'struct cppc_perf_caps' to
>   'struct cppc_perf_ctrls' as it represents a control register.
>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
> ---
>  include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> index 4bcdcaf8bf2c..6573a759eb8d 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> @@ -119,8 +119,6 @@ struct cppc_perf_caps {
>         u32 lowest_nonlinear_perf;
>         u32 lowest_freq;
>         u32 nominal_freq;
> -       u32 energy_perf;
> -       bool auto_sel;
>  };
>
>  struct cppc_perf_ctrls {
> @@ -128,6 +126,7 @@ struct cppc_perf_ctrls {
>         u32 min_perf;
>         u32 desired_perf;
>         u32 energy_perf;
> +       bool auto_sel;
>  };
>
>  struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs {
> --

It looks like this patch and the next one can be applied independently
of the other patches in the series.

Do you want me to do that?