linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] remoteproc: qcom: probe all child devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6nv6mb5mvyzmqve3jgrzctnb5em7xlzpvj6fcxtdmuvfeqlsfw@yzeaojgjp5ax>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:50:46 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
        krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        lukasz.luba@....com, konradybcio@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org,
        casey.connolly@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@....qualcomm.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        manaf.pallikunhi@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] remoteproc: qcom: probe all child devices

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 09:27:17PM +0530, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
> From: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>
> 
> Currently, only qcom,bam-dmux nodes are supported as
> remoteproc children with of_platform_populate(). This limits
> the other child nodes to probe separately.
> 
> Generalise the qcom,bam-dmux child node support by probing all
> remoteproc children with of_platform_populate(). This enables
> support for devices that represent themselves as subnodes of
> the remoteproc, such as QMI clients.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c     | 4 ++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 8 --------
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

You received a question from the reviewers and then posted the same
patch without concluding the previous discussion. NAK.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry