[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5a0646e-f21d-48a2-8a57-e47db794a327@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:58:59 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: sophgo: cv1800b: document DAC overwrite
handling
On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 10:57:43PM +0400, Anton D. Stavinskii wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 06:49:14PM +0400, Mark Brown wrote:
> > You've not provided a Signed-off-by for this so I can't do anything with
> > it, please see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for details
> > on what this is and why it's important.
> Sorry. I was relying on b4 prep --check. Looks like it was wrong. Should
> I resend as v1?
Probably easiest to just resend - sending as v2 is fine and probably
less likely to confuse tools.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists