lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5aea412c-9c7f-4692-af3e-79937956ef8c@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 20:47:31 +0000
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
To: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, fenghuay@...dia.com,
 reinette.chatre@...el.com, james.morse@....com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] kselftests/resctrl: Add support for CAT test on
 ARM

Hi Shaopeng,

On 1/23/26 04:40, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
> Currently, CAT test is limited to Intel architectures.
> Add cache cleaning and enable result checking for Arm architectures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> index e1b30ab4cef5..58b1590695d1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int check_results(struct resctrl_val_param *param, const char *cache_type
>  		ret = show_results_info(sum_llc_perf_miss, bits,
>  					alloc_size / 64,
>  					MIN_DIFF_PERCENT_PER_BIT * (bits - 1),
> -					runs, get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL,
> +					runs, (get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL || get_vendor() == ARCH_ARM),
>  					&prev_avg_llc_val);
>  		if (ret)
>  			fail = 1;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c
> index 19a01a52dc1a..dbbf80d22f42 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ static void cl_flush(void *p)
>  #if defined(__i386) || defined(__x86_64)
>  	asm volatile("clflush (%0)\n\t"
>  		     : : "r"(p) : "memory");
> +#elif defined(__aarch64__)
> +	__asm__ __volatile__("dc civac, %0\n\t"
> +		     : : "r" (p) : "memory");
> +

This is only guaranteed to clean and invalidate to the point of
coherence, PoC. On Grace I expect this is L3/slc and so the cache line
there in L3/slc is likely not invalidated or pushed to DRAM.

The dsb() for synchronization is missing for aarch64 in sb().

>  #endif
>  }
>  

Thanks,

Ben


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ