linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] i2c: xiic: use generic device property accessors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aXksyEkisTZdiByx@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 23:23:20 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: abdurrahman@...thop.ai
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, info@...ean-labs.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] i2c: xiic: use generic device property accessors

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 09:03:54PM +0000, Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay wrote:
> Switch to generic device property accessors.
> 
> Switch to managed devm_ functions to simplify error handling.
> 
> Make the clock optional since the driver is designed to operate without
> explicit configuration in firmware thus making it useful on platforms
> where clock is not or cannot be provided.

Why the heck you ignored my tags?!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko