[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260127133431.671e4605eee807abe84f92f4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:34:31 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel-team@...a.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com, david@...nel.org, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
osalvador@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax/kmem: add build config for protected dax memory
blocks
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 21:42:22 -0500 Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net> wrote:
> Since this protection may break userspace tools, it should
> be an opt-in until those tools have time to update to the
> new daxN.M/hotplug interface instead of memory blocks.
>
> --- a/drivers/dax/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/dax/Kconfig
> @@ -78,4 +78,22 @@ config DEV_DAX_KMEM
>
> Say N if unsure.
>
> +config DEV_DAX_KMEM_PROTECTED
Users must rebuild and redeploy kernels after having updated a
userspace tool. They won't thank us for this ;)
Isn't there something we can do to make this feature
backward-compatible?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists