[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127163609.4d1f1647@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:36:09 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo
Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian
Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/5] perf: Use current->flags &
PF_KTHREAD|PF_USER_WORKER instead of current->mm == NULL
On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 11:07:05 -0800
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> Trying. So far I can no longer reproduce the problem with the patch below applied.
> Obviously that doesn't mean that the problem is fixed, only that I can no longer
> reproduce it. I'll keep trying with different platforms.
Well, the revert of the patch just replaces the flags test with a test for
current->mm being NULL. This patch simply makes all those locations test
both the flags and for current->mm being NULL.
I can't see how it doesn't fix it.
Anyway, I'll start making this into a legitimate patch.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists