linux-kernel - [PATCH] firewire: core: fix race condition against transaction list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260127223413.22265-1-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:34:13 +0900
From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
To: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Persson <andreasp56@...look.com>
Subject: [PATCH] firewire: core: fix race condition against transaction list

The list of transaction is enumerated without acquiring card lock when
processing AR response event. This causes a race condition bug when
processing AT request completion event concurrently.

This commit fixes the bug by put timer start for split transaction
expiration into the scope of lock. The value of jiffies in card structure
is referred before acquiring the lock.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v6.18
Fixes: b5725cfa4120 ("firewire: core: use spin lock specific to timer for split transaction")
Reported-by: Andreas Persson <andreasp56@...look.com>
Closes: https://github.com/alsa-project/snd-firewire-ctl-services/issues/209
Tested-by: Andreas Persson <andreasp56@...look.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
---
 drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c b/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
index 7fea11a5e359..22ae387ae03c 100644
--- a/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
@@ -173,20 +173,14 @@ static void split_transaction_timeout_callback(struct timer_list *timer)
 	}
 }
 
-static void start_split_transaction_timeout(struct fw_transaction *t,
-					    struct fw_card *card)
+// card->transactions.lock should be acquired in advance for the linked list.
+static void start_split_transaction_timeout(struct fw_transaction *t, unsigned int delta)
 {
-	unsigned long delta;
-
 	if (list_empty(&t->link) || WARN_ON(t->is_split_transaction))
 		return;
 
 	t->is_split_transaction = true;
 
-	// NOTE: This can be without irqsave when we can guarantee that __fw_send_request() for
-	// local destination never runs in any type of IRQ context.
-	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &card->split_timeout.lock)
-		delta = card->split_timeout.jiffies;
 	mod_timer(&t->split_timeout_timer, jiffies + delta);
 }
 
@@ -207,13 +201,20 @@ static void transmit_complete_callback(struct fw_packet *packet,
 		break;
 	case ACK_PENDING:
 	{
+		unsigned int delta;
+
 		// NOTE: This can be without irqsave when we can guarantee that __fw_send_request() for
 		// local destination never runs in any type of IRQ context.
 		scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &card->split_timeout.lock) {
 			t->split_timeout_cycle =
 				compute_split_timeout_timestamp(card, packet->timestamp) & 0xffff;
+			delta = card->split_timeout.jiffies;
 		}
-		start_split_transaction_timeout(t, card);
+
+		// NOTE: This can be without irqsave when we can guarantee that __fw_send_request() for
+		// local destination never runs in any type of IRQ context.
+		scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &card->transactions.lock)
+			start_split_transaction_timeout(t, delta);
 		break;
 	}
 	case ACK_BUSY_X:

base-commit: 6b617317e5bc95e9962a712314ae0c4b7a4d5cc3
-- 
2.51.0