lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127055321.2400480-1-s9430939@naver.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:53:21 +0900
From: Minu Jin <s9430939@...er.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org,
	juri.lelli@...hat.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	david@...nel.org,
	kees@...nel.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	bsegall@...gle.com,
	mgorman@...e.de,
	vschneid@...hat.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
	vbabka@...e.cz,
	rppt@...nel.org,
	surenb@...gle.com,
	mhocko@...e.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Minu Jin <s9430939@...er.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fork: clarify copy_mm() comment for kernel thread

The existing comment is misleading:

    1. "steal a active VM" suggests this code performs the active_mm
       borrowing, but the actual borrowing happens in context_switch()
       where 'next->active_mm = prev->active_mm' is assigned.
       This code simply returns 0 to skip mm copying for kernel threads.

    2. "active VM" is outdated terminology, the kernel uses "active_mm".

Update the comment to accurately describe what this code does.

Signed-off-by: Minu Jin <s9430939@...er.com>
---
 kernel/fork.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index b1f3915d5f8e..4bfd606004db 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1566,9 +1566,10 @@ static int copy_mm(u64 clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	tsk->active_mm = NULL;
 
 	/*
-	 * Are we cloning a kernel thread?
+	 * Kernel threads have no 'mm' of their own as they borrow the
+	 * 'active_mm' from the previous process at context_switch().
 	 *
-	 * We need to steal a active VM for that..
+	 * Return 0 directly to skip the copy_mm process.
 	 */
 	oldmm = current->mm;
 	if (!oldmm)
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ