[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127010511.74604-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 17:05:10 -0800
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/cma: Replace snprintf with strscpy in cma_new_area
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:54:50 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:47:22 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > @@ -233,7 +234,7 @@ static int __init cma_new_area(const char *name, phys_addr_t size,
> > > cma_area_count++;
> > >
> > > if (name)
> > > - snprintf(cma->name, CMA_MAX_NAME, "%s", name);
> > > + strscpy(cma->name, name);
> >
> > Any reason to drop CMA_MAX_NAME protection? You can pass the size of
> > destination buffer as the third argument of strscpy().
>
> strscpy() will now use sizeof(cma->name):
>
> char name[CMA_MAX_NAME];
Ah, you're right.
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Thanks,
SJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists