linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] mailbox: pcc: Refactor and improve initialisation and interrupt handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aXiFlkKAuV8QSgcM@bogus>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:29:58 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@...nel.org>
To: Adam Young <admiyo@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	Adam Young <admiyo@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Robbie King <robbiek@...ghtlabs.com>,
	Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mailbox: pcc: Refactor and improve initialisation
 and interrupt handling

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:07:26PM -0500, Adam Young wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/12/26 11:55, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 02:40:56PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > Hi Jassi,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 08:08:14PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > This series refines and stabilizes the PCC mailbox driver to improve
> > > > initialisation order, interrupt handling, and completion signaling.
> > > > 
> > > Are you happy to pull these patches directly from the list or do you
> > > prefer me to send you pull request or do you want me to direct this via
> > > ACPI/Rafael's tree. Please advice.
> > > 
> > Hi Jassi,
> > 
> > Sorry for the nag. I did see these patches in -next as well as your
> > v6.19 merge window pull request which didn't make it to Linus tree.
> > However I don't see it -next any longer. Please advice if you want
> > anything from my side so that this can be merged for v6.20/v7.0
> > 
> 
> I thought you had an approach you wanted to implement for the functions that
> provided access to the Mailbox internals: you wanted to do them inline but
> hadn't gotten to them yet.  Is that still the case?  I will resubmit mine as
> is with -next if that is acceptable.
> 

Honestly, it has been a while and I have lost the context. Please post what
you have or thinking of on top of linux-next or jassi's -next and we can start
the discussion fresh.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep