[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2e191c4-dec4-4e42-b108-353778d9bd18@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 11:41:00 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Frank Wunderlich <frankwu@....de>, Chad Monroe <chad@...roe.io>,
Cezary Wilmanski <cezary.wilmanski@...ran.com>,
Avinash Jayaraman <ajayaraman@...linear.com>, Bing tao Xu
<bxu@...linear.com>, Liang Xu <lxu@...linear.com>,
Juraj Povazanec <jpovazanec@...linear.com>,
"Fanni (Fang-Yi) Chan" <fchan@...linear.com>,
"Benny (Ying-Tsan) Weng" <yweng@...linear.com>,
"Livia M. Rosu" <lrosu@...linear.com>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 4/4] net: dsa: add basic initial driver for
MxL862xx switches
On 1/22/26 4:42 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> +static int mxl862xx_send_cmd(struct mxl862xx_priv *priv, u16 cmd, u16 size,
> + bool quiet)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = mxl862xx_reg_write(priv, MXL862XX_MMD_REG_LEN_RET, size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = mxl862xx_reg_write(priv, MXL862XX_MMD_REG_CTRL,
> + cmd | CTRL_BUSY_MASK);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = mxl862xx_busy_wait(priv);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = mxl862xx_reg_read(priv, MXL862XX_MMD_REG_LEN_RET);
> + /* handle errors returned by the firmware as -EIO
> + * The firmware is based on Zephyr OS and uses the errors as
> + * defined in errno.h of Zephyr OS. See
> + * https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/v3.7.0/lib/libc/minimal/include/errno.h
> + */
> + if ((s16)ret < 0) {
The cast is likely not needed above? if `ret` values < S16_MIN are
possible this will return such values to the caller without the IO err
printk.
> + if (!quiet)
> + dev_err(&priv->mdiodev->dev,
> + "CMD %04x returned error %d\n", cmd, (s16)ret);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int mxl862xx_api_wrap(struct mxl862xx_priv *priv, u16 cmd, void *_data,
> + u16 size, bool read, bool quiet)
> +{
> + __le16 *data = _data;
> + u16 max, i;
> + int ret, cmd_ret;
Minor nit: reverse christmas tree above.
BTW the initial port isolation LGTM, but I would appreciate some DSA
expert second opinion.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists