[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXiYty1gFMcmC4lT@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 12:51:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] iio: dac: ds4424: fix -128 rejection and refactor
raw access
On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 11:49:05AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 12:42:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 07:09:37AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
...
> > > + /*
> > > + * Currents exiting the IC (Source) are positive.
> > > + * Canonicalize 0 to sink; datasheet treats sign as don't-care.
> > > + */
> > > + if (val > 0)
> > > + abs_val |= DS4424_DAC_SOURCE;
> >
> > Hmm... Maybe 0 should be excluded as invalid?
>
> 0 is valid value for no current flow (power off). The direction bit
> DS4424_DAC_SOURCE will just make no difference if value is 0.
Perhaps elaborate this in the comment above?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists