[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127020617.2804780-5-zli94@ncsu.edu>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 21:04:57 -0500
From: Zecheng Li <zli94@...u.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Zecheng Li <zli94@...u.edu>,
xliuprof@...gle.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zecheng Li <zecheng@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 04/11] perf annotate-data: Improve type comparison from different scopes
From: Zecheng Li <zecheng@...gle.com>
When comparing types from different scopes, first compare their type
offsets. A larger offset means the field belongs to an outer
(enclosing) struct. This helps resolve cases where a pointer is found
in an inner scope, but a struct containing that pointer exists in an
outer scope. Previously, is_better_type would prefer the pointer type,
but the struct type is actually more complete and should be chosen.
Prefer types from outer scopes when is_better_type cannot determine
a better type. This is a heuristic for the case `struct A { struct B; }`
where A and B have the same size but I think in most cases A is in the
outer scope and should be preferred.
Signed-off-by: Zecheng Li <zecheng@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Zecheng Li <zli94@...u.edu>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
index 8ff1972981b7..8ea3e8b024e8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
@@ -1634,7 +1634,9 @@ static int find_data_type_die(struct data_loc_info *dloc, Dwarf_Die *type_die)
pr_debug_dtp("type_offset=%#x\n", type_offset);
}
- if (!found || is_better_type(type_die, &mem_die)) {
+ if (!found || dloc->type_offset < type_offset ||
+ (dloc->type_offset == type_offset &&
+ !is_better_type(&mem_die, type_die))) {
*type_die = mem_die;
dloc->type_offset = type_offset;
found = true;
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists