linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] media: qcom: flip the switch between Venus and Iris drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22583dde-caaa-4d64-bcb6-ac7f09916a8d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 18:35:01 +0530
From: Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
        Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita.agarwal@....qualcomm.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] media: qcom: flip the switch between Venus and
 Iris drivers


On 1/27/2026 5:52 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> As the Venus and Iris drivers are close to the "feature parity" for the
> common platforms (SC7280, SM8250), in order to get more attention to
> squashing bugs from the Iris driver, flip the switch and default to the
> Iris driver if both are enabled. The Iris driver has several
> regressions, but hopefully they can be fixed through the development
> cycle by the respective team. Also it is better to fail the test than
> crash the device (which Venus driver does a lot).
> 
> Note: then intention is to land this in 6.21, which might let us to
> drop those platforms from the Venus driver in 6.22+.
> 
> Testing methodology: fluster test-suite, single-threaded mode, SM8250
> device (RB5).

Could you run fluster on SC7280 as well ? Also please share the v4l2 
compliance results.

Regards,
Vikash