[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <becccb16-c7bf-417d-a065-bb3a98eac88f@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 21:56:42 +0800
From: "Li, Tianyou" <tianyou.li@...el.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
CC: David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Yong Hu <yong.hu@...el.com>, Nanhai Zou
<nanhai.zou@...el.com>, Yuan Liu <yuan1.liu@...el.com>, Tim Chen
<tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>, Yu C Chen
<yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Pan Deng <pan.deng@...el.com>, Chen Zhang
<zhangchen.kidd@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] mm/memory hotplug/unplug: Add
online_memory_block_pages() and offline_memory_block_pages()
On 1/27/2026 2:58 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 08:30:57PM +0800, Li, Tianyou wrote:
>> On 1/22/2026 7:32 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
>>>> index 751f248ca4a8..ea4d6fbf34fd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
>>>> @@ -246,31 +246,12 @@ static int memory_block_online(struct memory_block *mem)
>>>> nr_vmemmap_pages = mem->altmap->free;
>>>> mem_hotplug_begin();
>>>> - if (nr_vmemmap_pages) {
>>>> - ret = mhp_init_memmap_on_memory(start_pfn, nr_vmemmap_pages, zone);
>>>> - if (ret)
>>>> - goto out;
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> - ret = online_pages(start_pfn + nr_vmemmap_pages,
>>>> - nr_pages - nr_vmemmap_pages, zone, mem->group);
>>>> - if (ret) {
>>>> - if (nr_vmemmap_pages)
>>>> - mhp_deinit_memmap_on_memory(start_pfn, nr_vmemmap_pages);
>>>> - goto out;
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * Account once onlining succeeded. If the zone was unpopulated, it is
>>>> - * now already properly populated.
>>>> - */
>>>> - if (nr_vmemmap_pages)
>>>> - adjust_present_page_count(pfn_to_page(start_pfn), mem->group,
>>>> - nr_vmemmap_pages);
>>>> -
>>>> - mem->zone = zone;
>>>> -out:
>>>> + ret = online_memory_block_pages(start_pfn, nr_pages, nr_vmemmap_pages,
>>>> + zone, mem->group);
>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>> + mem->zone = zone;
>>> I think we can move most of memory_block_online() to the new function and
>>> pass struct memory_block to it.
>>> I'd suggest
>>>
>>> int mhp_block_online(struct memory_block *block)
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> int mhp_block_offline(struct memory_block *block)
>>>
>>> Other than that LGTM.
>>
>> It's doable, if not other comments I can change the code. Would it look like
>> moving the functions to mm/memory_hotplug.c, change the name to
>> mhp_block_online() and mhp_block_offline(), and change the references where
>> the original function invoked in drivers/base/memory.c?
> Yeah, that's what I thought about.
>
> Even more broadly, I think the functionality in drivers/base/memory.c
> belongs to mm/ much more than to drivers/ but that's surely out of scope
> for these patches.
>
Thanks Mike for the confirmation.
>> My prior thoughts on this was just break the code as small pieces as
>> necessary to handle the pages online part together with zone contiguous
>> state update.
> IMHO moving the entire function is cleaner, let's hear what David and Oscar
> think.
Sure. Actually the patch has been ready with the mhp_block_online() and
mhp_block_offline() moved to memory_hotplug.c, the
online_memory_block_pages() and offline_memory_block_pages() remains but
as static function.
Once get feedback from David and Oscar, I can change them accordingly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists