[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260128150112.8873-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:01:10 +0800
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>,
Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@...com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: Add bpf_arch_supports_fsession()
fsession programs can currently be loaded on architectures that do not
implement fsession support, which leads to runtime errors instead of a
clean verifier rejection.
For example, running fsession selftests on arm64 before fsession support
is added results in:
test_fsession_basic:PASS:fsession_test__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_fsession_basic:PASS:fsession_attach 0 nsec
check_result:FAIL:test_run_opts err unexpected error: -14 (errno 14)
Introduce bpf_arch_supports_fsession() to explicitly gate fsession usage
based on architecture support. Architectures without fsession support
will now fail program load with -EOPNOTSUPP, allowing selftests to skip
cleanly instead of errors at runtime.
x86 declares fsession support, while the default implementation returns
false.
Fixes: 2d419c44658f ("bpf: add fsession support")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 5 +++
include/linux/filter.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 +++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c | 32 ++++++++++++++-----
5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 5a075e06cf45..070ba80e39d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -4112,3 +4112,8 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_timed_may_goto(void)
{
return true;
}
+
+bool bpf_jit_supports_fsession(void)
+{
+ return true;
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index fd54fed8f95f..4e1cb4f91f49 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -1167,6 +1167,7 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_arena(void);
bool bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena);
bool bpf_jit_supports_private_stack(void);
bool bpf_jit_supports_timed_may_goto(void);
+bool bpf_jit_supports_fsession(void);
u64 bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void);
void arch_bpf_stack_walk(bool (*consume_fn)(void *cookie, u64 ip, u64 sp, u64 bp), void *cookie);
u64 arch_bpf_timed_may_goto(void);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index e0b8a8a5aaa9..3b1eb632bf7c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -3142,6 +3142,11 @@ bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena)
return false;
}
+bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_fsession(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
u64 __weak bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index c2f2650db9fd..6f867ebf78d1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -24872,6 +24872,9 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
case BPF_TRACE_FENTRY:
case BPF_TRACE_FEXIT:
case BPF_TRACE_FSESSION:
+ if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FSESSION &&
+ !bpf_jit_supports_fsession())
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (!btf_type_is_func(t)) {
bpf_log(log, "attach_btf_id %u is not a function\n",
btf_id);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
index 0c4b428e1cee..a299aeb8cc2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
@@ -29,8 +29,16 @@ static void test_fsession_basic(void)
struct fsession_test *skel = NULL;
int err;
- skel = fsession_test__open_and_load();
- if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fsession_test__open_and_load"))
+ skel = fsession_test__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fsession_test__open"))
+ return;
+
+ err = fsession_test__load(skel);
+ if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fsession_test__load"))
goto cleanup;
err = fsession_test__attach(skel);
@@ -47,8 +55,16 @@ static void test_fsession_reattach(void)
struct fsession_test *skel = NULL;
int err;
- skel = fsession_test__open_and_load();
- if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fsession_test__open_and_load"))
+ skel = fsession_test__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fsession_test__open"))
+ return;
+
+ err = fsession_test__load(skel);
+ if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fsession_test__load"))
goto cleanup;
/* first attach */
@@ -94,6 +110,10 @@ static void test_fsession_cookie(void)
bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test6, false);
err = fsession_test__load(skel);
+ if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ test__skip();
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fsession_test__load"))
goto cleanup;
@@ -111,10 +131,6 @@ static void test_fsession_cookie(void)
void test_fsession_test(void)
{
-#if !defined(__x86_64__)
- test__skip();
- return;
-#endif
if (test__start_subtest("fsession_test"))
test_fsession_basic();
if (test__start_subtest("fsession_reattach"))
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists