[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <259bdacf-d16e-4fff-9f6b-f860feb40aa8@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 10:14:59 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>,
Edwin Peer <epeer@...dia.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpu: nova-core: use checked arithmetic in FWSEC
firmware parsing
On 1/28/2026 5:53 AM, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Mon Jan 26, 2026 at 9:23 PM CET, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> @@ -267,7 +264,12 @@ fn new_fwsec(dev: &Device<device::Bound>, bios: &Vbios, cmd: FwsecCommand) -> Re
>> let ucode = bios.fwsec_image().ucode(&desc)?;
>> let mut dma_object = DmaObject::from_data(dev, ucode)?;
>>
>> - let hdr_offset = usize::from_safe_cast(desc.imem_load_size() + desc.interface_offset());
>> + // Compute hdr_offset = imem_load_size + interface_offset.
>
> I do get the idea behind those comments, but are we sure that's really a good
> idea? How do we ensure to keep them up to date in case we have to change the
> code?
>
> If we really want this, I'd at least chose a common syntax, e.g.
>
> // CALC: `imem_load_size + interface_offset`
>
> without the variable name the resulting value is assigned to.
>
> But I'd rather prefer to just drop those comments.
The idea of adding these comments was to improve readability. However, I
can drop them in the v3, that's fine with me.
Do you want me to wait for additional comments on this series, or should
I make the update and repost it? Thanks,
--
Joel Fernandes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists