linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: Add bpf_arch_supports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a10afa70-29b7-48ab-b241-8b0f602abe2f@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 09:33:44 -0800
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...a.com>, bot+bpf-ci@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
 yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
 sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, puranjay@...nel.org,
 xukuohai@...weicloud.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
 shuah@...nel.org, menglong8.dong@...il.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@...com,
 martin.lau@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpf: Add bpf_arch_supports_fsession()

On 1/28/26 7:35 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/28/26 10:26 AM, bot+bpf-ci@...nel.org wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>>> index 5a075e06cf..070ba80e39 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>>> @@ -4112,3 +4112,8 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_timed_may_goto(void)
>>>  {
>>>  	return true;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +bool bpf_jit_supports_fsession(void)
>>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> This is the actual function name in the code.
> 
> Ihor, I think the script parsing review-inline.txt chopped off the
> part of the review where AI was complaining about the commit message?

This is the email body pre-processing in KPD, yes.

At some point we decided to remove the commit message before sending
an email, but now that AI reviews the messages too, I think we should
just send the generated review-inline.txt as is.

Alexei, wdyt?

> 
> [...]
>