[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXqMRZqezVz8qn_3@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:23:01 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: raskar.shree97@...il.com
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
david.hunter.linux@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] iio: proximity: rfd77402: Use kernel helper for
result polling
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:21:50PM +0530, Shrikant Raskar via B4 Relay wrote:
> Replace the manually written polling loop with read_poll_timeout(),
> the kernel's standard helper for waiting on hardware status.This
> makes the code easier to read.
>
> Move the polling logic into a dedicated helper function, as it will
> be reused by future updates.
...
> -static int rfd77402_measure(struct i2c_client *client)
> +static int rfd77402_wait_for_result(struct rfd77402_data *data)
> {
> + struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> + int val, ret;
Where is the newly introduced comment?
> + ret = read_poll_timeout(i2c_smbus_read_byte_data, val,
> + (val < 0) || (val & RFD77402_ICSR_RESULT),
> + 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> + 10 * 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> + false,
> + client, RFD77402_ICSR);
> + if (val < 0)
> + return val;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
...
> - /*
> - * As per RFD77402 datasheet section '3.1.1 Single Measure',
> - * the suggested timeout value for single measure is 100ms.
> - */
???
See above.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists