[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260128234736.49bd70b3@wsk>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:47:36 +0100
From: Łukasz Majewski <lukasz.majewski@...lbox.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, festevam@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
kernel@...gutronix.de, horms@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, wahrenst@....net, pabeni@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,v20,2/7] net: mtip: The L2 switch driver for imx287
Hi Andrew,
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:41:25PM +0100, Łukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> > > This is an AI-generated review
> >
> > AI is going to take the "Maintainer's" job :D
>
> We had a bit of a discussion about this.
>
> Our observations so far is that AI finds different sorts of issues,
> which human reviewer often don't spot. It also does get things wrong,
> so we spend some time sanity checking its reports. So overall, it
> might actually increase the workload, but also increase the quality of
> the code which gets committed.
>
Frankly - from the MTIP L2 switch patch set review - the AI review does
a _really_ good job ...
It finds non trivial issues - with very deep insights to function's
call dependencies.
> Andrew
--
Best regards,
Łukasz Majewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists