[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260128180602.4dd645de@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 18:06:02 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
joey.gouly@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com, yuzenghui@...wei.com,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
jstultz@...gle.com, qperret@...gle.com, will@...nel.org,
aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/30] tracing: Add events to trace remotes
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 10:43:58 +0000
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com> wrote:
> +
> +static int __cmp_events(const void *id, const void *evt)
> +{
> + return (long)id - ((struct remote_event *)evt)->id;
Hmm, just to be safe, we should probably make everything int here, to not
have any overflow issues:
static int __cmp_events(const void *key, const void *data)
{
const struct remote_event *evt = data;
int id = (int)((long)key);
return id - (int)evt->id;
}
-- Steve
> +}
> +
> +static struct remote_event *trace_remote_find_event(struct trace_remote *remote, unsigned short id)
> +{
> + return bsearch((const void *)(unsigned long)id, remote->events, remote->nr_events,
> + sizeof(*remote->events), __cmp_events);
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists