Message-ID: <20260128044251.1229702-3-longman@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 23:42:51 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH/for-next 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: Introduce a new top level isolcpus_update_mutex

The current cpuset partition code is able to dynamically update
the sched domains of a running system and the corresponding
HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask to perform what is essentally the
"isolcpus=domain,..." boot command line feature at run time.

The housekeeping cpumask update requires flushing a number of different
workqueues which may not be safe with cpus_read_lock() held as the
workqueue flushing code may acquire cpus_read_lock() or acquiring locks
which have locking dependency with cpus_read_lock() down the chain. Below
is an example of such circular locking problem.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.18.0-test+ #2 Tainted: G S
  ------------------------------------------------------
  test_cpuset_prs/10971 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff888112ba4958 ((wq_completion)sync_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x7a/0x180

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffae47f450 (cpuset_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: cpuset_partition_write+0x85/0x130

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
  -> #4 (cpuset_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
  -> #3 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
  -> #2 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
  -> #1 ((work_completion)(&arg.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
  -> #0 ((wq_completion)sync_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}:

  Chain exists of:
    (wq_completion)sync_wq --> cpu_hotplug_lock --> cpuset_mutex

  5 locks held by test_cpuset_prs/10971:
   #0: ffff88816810e440 (sb_writers#7){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0
   #1: ffff8891ab620890 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x260/0x5f0
   #2: ffff8890a78b83e8 (kn->active#187){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2b6/0x5f0
   #3: ffffffffadf32900 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuset_partition_write+0x77/0x130
   #4: ffffffffae47f450 (cpuset_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: cpuset_partition_write+0x85/0x130

  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
     :
   touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x93/0x180
   __flush_workqueue+0x111/0x10b0
   housekeeping_update+0x12d/0x2d0
   update_parent_effective_cpumask+0x595/0x2440
   update_prstate+0x89d/0xce0
   cpuset_partition_write+0xc5/0x130
   cgroup_file_write+0x1a5/0x680
   kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3df/0x5f0
   vfs_write+0x525/0xfd0
   ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0
   do_syscall_64+0x95/0x520
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

To avoid such a circular locking dependency problem, we have to
call housekeeping_update() without holding the cpus_read_lock()
and cpuset_mutex. One way to do that is to introduce a new top level
isolcpus_update_mutex which will be acquired first if the set of isolated
CPUs may have to be updated. This new isolcpus_update_mutex will provide
the need mutual exclusion without the need to hold cpus_read_lock().

As cpus_read_lock() is now no longer held when
tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask() is called, it needs to acquire it
directly.

The lockdep_is_cpuset_held() is also updated to check the new
isolcpus_update_mutex.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c        | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 kernel/sched/isolation.c      |  4 +-
 kernel/time/timer_migration.c |  3 +-
 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 98c7cb732206..96390ceb5122 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static cpumask_var_t	subpartitions_cpus;
 static cpumask_var_t	isolated_cpus;
 
 /*
- * isolated_cpus updating flag (protected by cpuset_mutex)
+ * isolated_cpus updating flag (protected by isolcpus_update_mutex)
  * Set if isolated_cpus is going to be updated in the current
  * cpuset_mutex crtical section.
  */
@@ -223,29 +223,46 @@ struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
 };
 
 /*
- * There are two global locks guarding cpuset structures - cpuset_mutex and
- * callback_lock. The cpuset code uses only cpuset_mutex. Other kernel
- * subsystems can use cpuset_lock()/cpuset_unlock() to prevent change to cpuset
- * structures. Note that cpuset_mutex needs to be a mutex as it is used in
- * paths that rely on priority inheritance (e.g. scheduler - on RT) for
- * correctness.
+ * CPUSET Locking Convention
+ * -------------------------
  *
- * A task must hold both locks to modify cpusets.  If a task holds
- * cpuset_mutex, it blocks others, ensuring that it is the only task able to
- * also acquire callback_lock and be able to modify cpusets.  It can perform
- * various checks on the cpuset structure first, knowing nothing will change.
- * It can also allocate memory while just holding cpuset_mutex.  While it is
- * performing these checks, various callback routines can briefly acquire
- * callback_lock to query cpusets.  Once it is ready to make the changes, it
- * takes callback_lock, blocking everyone else.
+ * Below are the three global locks guarding cpuset structures in lock
+ * acquisition order:
+ *  - isolcpus_update_mutex (optional)
+ *  - cpu_hotplug_lock (cpus_read_lock/cpus_write_lock)
+ *  - cpuset_mutex
+ *  - callback_lock (raw spinlock)
  *
- * Calls to the kernel memory allocator can not be made while holding
- * callback_lock, as that would risk double tripping on callback_lock
- * from one of the callbacks into the cpuset code from within
- * __alloc_pages().
+ * The first isolcpus_update_mutex should only be held if the existing set of
+ * isolated CPUs (in isolated partition) or any of the partition states may be
+ * changed when some cpuset control files are being written into. Otherwise,
+ * it can be skipped. Holding isolcpus_update_mutex/cpus_read_lock or
+ * cpus_write_lock will ensure mutual exclusion of isolated_cpus update.
  *
- * If a task is only holding callback_lock, then it has read-only
- * access to cpusets.
+ * As cpuset will now indirectly flush a number of different workqueues in
+ * housekeeping_update() when the set of isolated CPUs is going to be changed,
+ * it may not be safe from the circular locking perspective to hold the
+ * cpus_read_lock. So cpuset_full_lock() will be released before calling
+ * housekeeping_update() and re-acquired afterward.
+ *
+ * A task must hold all the remaining three locks to modify externally visible
+ * or used fields of cpusets, though some of the internally used cpuset fields
+ * can be modified by holding cpu_hotplug_lock and cpuset_mutex only. If only
+ * reliable read access of the externally used fields are needed, a task can
+ * hold either cpuset_mutex or callback_lock.
+ *
+ * If a task holds cpu_hotplug_lock and cpuset_mutex, it blocks others,
+ * ensuring that it is the only task able to also acquire callback_lock and
+ * be able to modify cpusets.  It can perform various checks on the cpuset
+ * structure first, knowing nothing will change. It can also allocate memory
+ * without holding callback_lock. While it is performing these checks, various
+ * callback routines can briefly acquire callback_lock to query cpusets.  Once
+ * it is ready to make the changes, it takes callback_lock, blocking everyone
+ * else.
+ *
+ * Calls to the kernel memory allocator cannot be made while holding
+ * callback_lock which is a spinlock, as the memory allocator may sleep or
+ * call back into cpuset code and acquire callback_lock.
  *
  * Now, the task_struct fields mems_allowed and mempolicy may be changed
  * by other task, we use alloc_lock in the task_struct fields to protect
@@ -256,6 +273,7 @@ struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
  * cpumasks and nodemasks.
  */
 
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(isolcpus_update_mutex);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpuset_mutex);
 
 /**
@@ -302,7 +320,7 @@ void cpuset_full_unlock(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 bool lockdep_is_cpuset_held(void)
 {
-	return lockdep_is_held(&cpuset_mutex);
+	return lockdep_is_held(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -1294,9 +1312,8 @@ static bool prstate_housekeeping_conflict(int prstate, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
 static void __update_isolation_cpumasks(bool twork);
 static void isolation_task_work_fn(struct callback_head *cb)
 {
-	cpuset_full_lock();
+	guard(mutex)(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
 	__update_isolation_cpumasks(true);
-	cpuset_full_lock();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1338,8 +1355,18 @@ static void __update_isolation_cpumasks(bool twork)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
+	/*
+	 * Release cpus_read_lock & cpuset_mutex before calling
+	 * housekeeping_update() and re-acquiring them afterward if not
+	 * calling from task_work.
+	 */
+	if (!twork)
+		cpuset_full_unlock();
 	ret = housekeeping_update(isolated_cpus);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
+	if (!twork)
+		cpuset_full_lock();
 
 	isolated_cpus_updating = false;
 }
@@ -3196,6 +3223,7 @@ ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 		return -EACCES;
 
 	buf = strstrip(buf);
+	mutex_lock(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
 	cpuset_full_lock();
 	if (!is_cpuset_online(cs))
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -3226,6 +3254,7 @@ ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 		rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
 out_unlock:
 	cpuset_full_unlock();
+	mutex_unlock(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
 	if (of_cft(of)->private == FILE_MEMLIST)
 		schedule_flush_migrate_mm();
 	return retval ?: nbytes;
@@ -3329,6 +3358,7 @@ static ssize_t cpuset_partition_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
 	else
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	guard(mutex)(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
 	cpuset_full_lock();
 	if (is_cpuset_online(cs))
 		retval = update_prstate(cs, val);
@@ -3502,6 +3532,7 @@ static void cpuset_css_killed(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
 {
 	struct cpuset *cs = css_cs(css);
 
+	guard(mutex)(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
 	cpuset_full_lock();
 	/* Reset valid partition back to member */
 	if (is_partition_valid(cs))
diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 3b725d39c06e..ef152d401fe2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *isol_mask)
 	struct cpumask *trial, *old = NULL;
 	int err;
 
-	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
-
 	trial = kmalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!trial)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -136,7 +134,7 @@ int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *isol_mask)
 	}
 
 	if (!housekeeping.flags)
-		static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden);
+		static_branch_enable(&housekeeping_overridden);
 
 	if (housekeeping.flags & HK_FLAG_DOMAIN)
 		old = housekeeping_cpumask_dereference(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN);
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
index 6da9cd562b20..244a8d025e78 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
@@ -1559,8 +1559,6 @@ int tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask(struct cpumask *exclude_cpumask)
 	cpumask_var_t cpumask __free(free_cpumask_var) = CPUMASK_VAR_NULL;
 	int cpu;
 
-	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
-
 	if (!works)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
@@ -1570,6 +1568,7 @@ int tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask(struct cpumask *exclude_cpumask)
 	 * First set previously isolated CPUs as available (unisolate).
 	 * This cpumask contains only CPUs that switched to available now.
 	 */
+	guard(cpus_read_lock)();
 	cpumask_andnot(cpumask, cpu_online_mask, exclude_cpumask);
 	cpumask_andnot(cpumask, cpumask, tmigr_available_cpumask);
 
-- 
2.52.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists