linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] misc: fastrpc: check qcom_scm_assign_mem() return in rpmsg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2026012814-ignition-stiffly-cd0d@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 06:47:47 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Xingjing Deng <micro6947@...il.com>
Cc: srini@...nel.org, amahesh@....qualcomm.com, arnd@...db.de,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xingjing Deng <xjdeng@...a.edu.cn>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] misc: fastrpc: check qcom_scm_assign_mem() return in
 rpmsg_probe

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:34:54AM +0800, Xingjing Deng wrote:
> In the SDSP probe path, qcom_scm_assign_mem() is used to assign the
> reserved memory to the configured VMIDs, but its return value was not checked.
> 
> Fail the probe if the SCM call fails to avoid continuing with an
> unexpected/incorrect memory permission configuration.
> 
> This issue was detected by a private static analysis tool.
> No actual hardware testing was performed as the issue is purely
> code-level and verified via static analysis.
> 
> Fixes: c3c0363bc72d4 ("misc: fastrpc: support complete DMA pool access to the DSP")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 6.11-rc1
> Signed-off-by: Xingjing Deng <xjdeng@...a.edu.cn>
> ---
> v6:
> - Add description of the detection tool.
> - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260117140351.875511-1-xjdeng@buaa.edu.cn/T/#u
> 
> v5:
> - Squash the functional change and indentation fix into a single patch.
> - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/2026011637-statute-showy-2c3f@gregkh/T/#t
> 
> v4:
> - Format the indentation
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260113084352.72itrloj5w7qb5o3@hu-mojha-hyd.qualcomm.com/T/#t
> 
> v3:
> - Add missing linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org to cc list.
> - Standarlize changelog placement/format.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260113063618.e2ke47gy3hnfi67e@hu-mojha-hyd.qualcomm.com/T/#t
> 
> v2:
> - Add Fixes: and Cc: stable tags.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260113022550.4029635-1-xjdeng@buaa.edu.cn/T/#u
> ---
>  drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index ee652ef01534..8bac2216cb20 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -2337,8 +2337,11 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>  		if (!err) {
>  			src_perms = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
>  
> -			qcom_scm_assign_mem(res.start, resource_size(&res), &src_perms,
> +			err = qcom_scm_assign_mem(res.start, resource_size(&res), &src_perms,
>  				    data->vmperms, data->vmcount);
> +			if (err) {
> +				goto err_free_data;
> +			}
>  		}
>  
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

Always run checkpatch.pl on your changes so that you don't get grumpy
maintainers asking why you didn't run checkpatch.pl on your change :)

thanks,

greg k-h