lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2026012854-shrink-mangle-f642@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 06:55:08 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Madhumitha Sundar <madhuananda18@...il.com>
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: sm750fb: make fix_id array fully const

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 04:48:15PM +0000, Madhumitha Sundar wrote:
> The fix_id array contains constant string literals, but the array itself
> is currently mutable. Make the array const so that the compiler can
> place it in the .rodata section.
> 
> This fixes the checkpatch warning:
> static const char * array should probably be static const char * const
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Sundar <madhuananda18@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> index d100b9e1d3d5..092cfbadada4 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static int lynxfb_set_fbinfo(struct fb_info *info, int index)
>  		"kernel HELPERS prepared vesa_modes",
>  	};
>  
> -	static const char *fix_id[2] = {
> +	static const char * const fix_id[2] = {
>  		"sm750_fb1", "sm750_fb2",
>  	};
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ