[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d3a2dac-ef86-4855-9978-79f0815e2c01@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 08:38:26 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@...sung.com>,
'Rob Herring' <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, conor+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rosa.pila@...sung.com,
selvarasu.g@...sung.com, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
muhammed.ali@...sung.com, faraz.ata@...sung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dev.tailor@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add and enable USB nodes for ExynosAutov920 SoC
On 23/01/2026 07:23, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
>
> Apologize for any inconvenience caused by the issues you’ve identified.
> Below, Have outlined the changes, will implement to address the warnings
> and ensure the patch set aligns with the required standards.
>
> Proposed Changes:
> 1. Will include #phy-cells = <0>; in the USB PHY nodes
> (usb_phy0, usb_phy1, usb_phy2, and usb_phy3)
> This is a crucial addition to avoid compilation warnings and ensure compatibility.
>
> Example:
> usb_phy0: usb-phy0 {
> compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
> #phy-cells = <0>;
> vbus-supply = <&usbdrd31_dwc3_vbus>;
> };
>
> 2. The errors were not caught by the make dt_binding_check and make dtbs_check
> commands
> make -j ARCH=arm64 dt_binding_check dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
> make -j ARCH=arm64 dt_binding_check dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/samsung,exynos-dwc3.yaml
>
> 3. Once the above changes are verified and tested, I will incorporate them into the
> next version of the patch set (v3).
>
> Questions:
> 1. Are the Proposed Changes Correct?
> Please confirm if the inclusion of #phy-cells = <0>; in the USB PHY nodes is the correct
> fix for the issue. If there are additional changes required, kindly let me know.
>
> 2. Why Warnings Were Not Captured During Initial Checks?
> The make dt_binding_check and make dtbs_check commands did not flag the warnings,
> which suggests the schema or bindings might not be comprehensive enough. Could you
> provide insights or recommendations on how to improve the schema to catch such issues
> in the future?
Please explain, why are we talking through microslop ChatGPT?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists