[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ikcm9mxz.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 09:11:04 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, david.kaplan@....com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86/microcode: Distinguish NMI control path on
stop-machine callback
On Sun, Jan 25 2026 at 01:42, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> static int load_cpus_stopped(void *unused)
> {
> - if (microcode_ops->use_nmi) {
> - /* Enable the NMI handler and raise NMI */
> - this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.nmi_enabled, true);
> - apic->send_IPI(smp_processor_id(), NMI_VECTOR);
> - } else {
> - /* Just invoke the handler directly */
> - microcode_update_handler();
> - }
> + /* Enable the NMI handler and raise NMI */
> + this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.nmi_enabled, true);
> + apic->send_IPI(smp_processor_id(), NMI_VECTOR);
> +
With this change the function name is completely bogus.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists