[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c71bac0e-0695-4aa3-bcfd-a369819a1539@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 09:28:45 +0800
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Cc: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com, sagis@...gle.com, vannapurve@...gle.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, nik.borisov@...e.com, zhenzhong.duan@...el.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, kas@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/26] x86/virt/tdx: Print SEAMCALL leaf numbers in
decimal
On 1/23/2026 10:55 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
> Both TDX spec and kernel defines SEAMCALL leaf numbers as decimal. Printing
> them in hex makes no sense. Correct it.
>
> Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - print leaf numbers with %llu
> ---
> arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> index 5ce4ebe99774..dbc7cb08ca53 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ typedef void (*sc_err_func_t)(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args);
>
> static inline void seamcall_err(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args)
> {
> - pr_err("SEAMCALL (0x%016llx) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err);
> + pr_err("SEAMCALL (%llu) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err);
> }
>
> static inline void seamcall_err_ret(u64 fn, u64 err,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists