[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ed93cd3-677c-4d0c-a3a6-25c3d47a4ef2@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 11:05:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bo Gan <ganboing@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
李志 <lizhi2@...incomputing.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ningyu@...incomputing.com, linmin@...incomputing.com,
pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com, weishangjuan@...incomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: ethernet: eswin: add clock sampling
control
On 23/01/2026 11:47, Bo Gan wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 1/23/26 02:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/01/2026 08:39, Bo Gan wrote:
>>>> I assume the address of the interface is fixed. So you can just key
>>>> off that to distinguish the two instances.
>>>>
>>>> Since this is an internal property, not a board property, it is not
>>>> clear it actually belongs on DT.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> IMO, they should be in DT to provide maximum flexibility. The SoC .dtsi
>>
>> This is not the purpose of DT. Please rather use arguments in terms of
>> DT rules (see docs, presentations).
>>
> Any examples? links? Thank you for your patience.
Really, doing simple search for it is your homework, not our task. You
need to try harder if you want to prove that you are not wasting our time.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings
Or any elinux resources or any recent talks of mine.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists