linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] clk: qcom: camcc-x1p42100: Add support for camera clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <76763847-e5f2-484a-9ff6-dab5906bdaaa@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 11:17:44 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@....qualcomm.com>,
        Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
        Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] clk: qcom: camcc-x1p42100: Add support for camera
 clock controller

On 1/27/26 8:26 PM, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
> Add support for the camera clock controller for camera clients to
> be able to request for camcc clocks on X1P42100 platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>
> ---

[...]

> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,x1e80100-camcc.h>

I have mixed feelings.
 
Purwa lacks sfe_0, pll7, pll8, ife_1 clocks and all their supporting
infrastructure. All other clocks seem to indeed be common.

Perhaps it's not that bad given it's a strict subset and they have
a shared DT

The driver itself looks OK

So

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>

Konrad