linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Add SM6350 LPASS LPI TLMM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5fcbfcef-5fb4-4d95-b75a-1c425d1c4183@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 13:39:21 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Add SM6350 LPASS LPI TLMM

On 1/28/26 1:26 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add support for the pin controller block on SM6350 Low Power Island.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> ---

[...]

> +static const struct lpi_pingroup sm6350_groups[] = {
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(0, 0, swr_tx_clk, qua_mi2s_sclk, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(1, 2, swr_tx_data, qua_mi2s_ws, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(2, 4, swr_tx_data, qua_mi2s_data, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(3, 8, swr_rx_clk, qua_mi2s_data, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(4, 10, swr_rx_data, qua_mi2s_data, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(5, 12, swr_rx_data, _, qua_mi2s_data, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(6, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic1_clk, i2s1_clk, _,  _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(7, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic1_data, i2s1_ws, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(8, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic2_clk, i2s1_data, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(9, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic2_data, i2s1_data, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(10, 16, i2s2_clk, wsa_swr_clk, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(11, 18, i2s2_ws, wsa_swr_data, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(12, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic3_clk, i2s2_data, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP(13, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic3_data, i2s2_data, _, _),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_SLEW_SPARE_1(14, 0, swr_tx_data, _, _, _),

Modulo this odd cookie, it's identical to 8250.. but then it messes with
all the definitions, so it makes sense to keep it separate

I verified all the functions and slew offsets


Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>

Konrad