[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260129133248.GJ10992@unreal>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:32:48 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>
Cc: jgg@...pe.ca, michael.chan@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dave.jiang@...el.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, gospo@...adcom.com,
selvin.xavier@...adcom.com, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 fwctl 2/5] fwctl/bnxt_en: Refactor aux bus functions
to be more generic
On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 09:37:07PM -0800, Pavan Chebbi wrote:
> Up until now there was only one auxiliary device that bnxt
> created and that was for RoCE driver. bnxt fwctl is also
> going to use an aux bus device that bnxt should create.
> This requires some nomenclature changes and refactoring of
> the existing bnxt aux dev functions.
>
> Convert 'aux_priv' and 'edev' members of struct bnxt into
> arrays where each element contains supported auxbus device's
> data. Move struct bnxt_aux_priv from bnxt.h to ulp.h because
> that is where it belongs. Make aux bus init/uninit/add/del
> functions more generic which will loop through all the aux
> device types. Make bnxt_ulp_start/stop functions (the only
> other common functions applicable to any aux device) loop
> through the aux devices to update their config and states.
> Make callers of bnxt_ulp_start() call it only when there
> are no errors.
>
> Also, as an improvement in code, bnxt_register_dev() can skip
> unnecessary dereferencing of edev from bp, instead use the
> edev pointer from the function parameter.
>
> Future patches will reuse these functions to add an aux bus
> device for fwctl.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 47 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h | 19 +-
> .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c | 8 +-
> .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ulp.c | 334 +++++++++++-------
> include/linux/bnxt/ulp.h | 25 +-
> 6 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-)
<...>
> +static void bnxt_auxdev_set_state(struct bnxt *bp, int idx, int state)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&bp->auxdev_lock);
> + bp->auxdev_state[idx] = state;
> + mutex_unlock(&bp->auxdev_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static bool bnxt_auxdev_is_init(struct bnxt *bp, int idx)
> +{
> + bool ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&bp->auxdev_lock);
> + ret = (bp->auxdev_state[idx] == BNXT_ADEV_STATE_INIT);
> + mutex_unlock(&bp->auxdev_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static bool bnxt_auxdev_is_active(struct bnxt *bp, int idx)
> +{
> + bool ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&bp->auxdev_lock);
> + ret = (bp->auxdev_state[idx] == BNXT_ADEV_STATE_ADD);
> + mutex_unlock(&bp->auxdev_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
<...>
> void bnxt_ulp_stop(struct bnxt *bp)
> {
> - struct bnxt_aux_priv *aux_priv = bp->aux_priv;
> - struct bnxt_en_dev *edev = bp->edev;
> -
> - if (!edev)
> - return;
> + int i;
>
> - mutex_lock(&edev->en_dev_lock);
> - if (!bnxt_ulp_registered(edev) ||
> - (edev->flags & BNXT_EN_FLAG_ULP_STOPPED))
> - goto ulp_stop_exit;
> -
> - edev->flags |= BNXT_EN_FLAG_ULP_STOPPED;
> - if (aux_priv) {
> + for (i = 0; i < __BNXT_AUXDEV_MAX; i++) {
> + struct bnxt_aux_priv *aux_priv;
> struct auxiliary_device *adev;
> + struct bnxt_en_dev *edev;
> +
> + if (!bnxt_auxdev_is_active(bp, i))
It’s good that you stopped using atomic_t for state variables, but the
locking is still incorrect. It’s not enough to hold the lock only while
reading the state; you need to keep the lock for the entire period during
which the auxdev is expected to remain active.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists