[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa92ce4a-d336-4d03-b87d-1c39b1c553da@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:41:43 +0100
From: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Sami Tolvanen
<samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, Daniel Gomez
<da.gomez@...nel.org>, Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nsc@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Bouchinet <nicolas.bouchinet@....cyber.gouv.fr>,
Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>,
Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@...xmox.com>,
Arnout Engelen <arnout@...t.net>, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@...reri.org>,
kpcyrd <kpcyrd@...hlinux.org>, Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>,
Câju Mihai-Drosi <mcaju95@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/17] module: Move signature splitting up
On 1/13/26 1:28 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The signature splitting will also be used by CONFIG_MODULE_HASHES.
>
> Move it up the callchain, so the result can be reused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> ---
> [...]
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index c09b25c0166a..d65bc300a78c 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -3346,10 +3346,21 @@ static int early_mod_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)
>
> static int module_integrity_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)
> {
> + bool mangled_module = flags & (MODULE_INIT_IGNORE_MODVERSIONS |
> + MODULE_INIT_IGNORE_VERMAGIC);
> + size_t sig_len;
> + const u8 *sig;
> int err = 0;
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_POLICY)) {
> + err = mod_split_sig(info->hdr, &info->len, mangled_module,
> + &sig_len, &sig, "module");
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
> - err = module_sig_check(info, flags);
> + err = module_sig_check(info, sig, sig_len);
>
> if (err)
> return err;
I suggest moving the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG) block under the
new IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_POLICY) section. I realize that
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG implies CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_POLICY, but I believe this
change makes it more apparent that this it the case. Otherwise, one
might for example wonder if sig_len in the module_sig_check() call can
be undefined.
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_POLICY)) {
err = mod_split_sig(info->hdr, &info->len, mangled_module,
&sig_len, &sig, "module");
if (err)
return err;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
err = module_sig_check(info, sig, sig_len);
}
--
Thanks,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists