[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260129173252.GA1309005-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 11:32:52 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Microchip IPC
remoteproc
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:06:57PM +0000, Valentina Fernandez wrote:
> Microchip RISC-V SoCs typically contain one or more clusters. Clusters
> can operate in Asymmetric Multi-Processing (AMP) mode, where individual
> cores or groups of cores run as independent software contexts.
>
> The compatible is intentionally generic, representing a “generic” SBI
> ecall interface to a set of remote processors, with the platform
> abstracted via SBI ecalls. The IPC/IHC (named differently depending on
> whether it is RTL for the FPGA fabric or a hardened version) is
> intended for Asymmetric Multiprocessing, where a set of cores or
> clusters can run other firmware, such as Zephyr.
>
> Unlike platforms with a fixed DSP, the configuration here is variable
> even for a single SoC. For example, which memory regions are used for
> the remote cluster or which mailbox channel is selected. This binding
> documents that firmware interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>
> ---
> .../microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml | 131 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6fc0ab7f3ffb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Microchip IPC Remote Processor
> +
> +description:
Need '>' to maintain paragraph formatting.
> + Microchip RISC-V SoCs typically contain one or more clusters. Clusters can
> + operate in Asymmetric Multi-Processing (AMP) mode, where individual cores
> + or groups of cores run as independent software contexts.
> +
> + The configuration is flexible, as the set of cores or clusters that can be
> + controlled as remote processors may vary, and memory regions used for
> + firmware as well as mailbox assignments depend on the system design.
> +
> + Communication with remote cores or clusters is abstracted using ecalls
> + to the platform's Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI) firmware, through
> + which the state of remote cores or clusters are controlled. This binding
> + documents that firmware interface.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc
> +
> + cpu:
> + description:
> + phandles to the CPUs comprising the remote cluster
More than 1? Then should be 'cpus'.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
Already has a type. Drop.
> +
> + mboxes:
> + description:
> + Microchip IPC mailbox specifier. Used for communication with
> + a remote cluster. For HSS versions prior to v2026.04, it is also
> + used for controlling the life cycle of a remote cluster. The
> + specifier format is as per the bindings in
> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/microchip,sbi-ipc.yaml
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + memory-region:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 5
> + description:
> + List of phandles to the reserved memory regions associated wih the
> + remoteproc device. This is variable and describes the memories shared
> + with the remote cluster (e.g. firmware, resource table, rpmsg vrings)
> + items:
> + anyOf:
> + - description: resource table when firmware is started by the bootloader
> + - description: remote cluster firmware image section
> + - description: virtio device (vdev) buffer
> + - description: vring0
> + - description: vring1
> +
> + memory-region-names:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 5
> + items:
> + anyOf:
Use 'enum'
> + - const: rsc-table
> + - const: firmware
> + - const: buffer
> + - const: vring0
> + - const: vring1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> +
> +# Remote Cluster ID is derived either from the CPU phandle or
> +# from the mailbox specifier prior to HSS v2026.04
> +anyOf:
> + - required:
> + - cpu
> + - required:
> + - mboxes
> +
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + memory-region-names:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - vring0
> + - vring1
> + then:
> + properties:
> + memory-region-names:
> + contains:
> + const: buffer
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + // Early boot mode example - firmware started by bootloader
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + remoteproc {
> + compatible = "microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc";
> + cpu = <&cpu4>;
> + mboxes= <&ihc 8>;
> + memory-region = <&rsctable>, <&vdev0buffer>,
> + <&vdev0vring0>, <&vdev0vring1>;
> + memory-region-names = "rsc-table", "buffer",
> + "vring0", "vring1";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + - |
> + // Late boot mode example - firmware started by Linux (remoteproc)
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + remoteproc {
> + compatible = "microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc";
> + cpu = <&cpu4>;
> + mboxes= <&ihc 8>;
> + memory-region = <&cluster_firmware>, <&vdev0buffer>,
> + <&vdev0vring0>, <&vdev0vring1>;
> + memory-region-names = "firmware", "buffer",
> + "vring0", "vring1";
> + };
> + };
> +...
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists