[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260128181122.0baf8ca9@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 18:11:22 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Cc: <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <sumang@...vell.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next,v5,05/13] octeontx2-af: npc: cn20k: Allocate default
MCAM indexes
On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 08:59:41 +0530 Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> On 2026-01-28 at 07:59:21, Jakub Kicinski (kuba@...nel.org) wrote:
> > > +chk_sanity:
> > > + dev_dbg(rvu->dev,
> > > + "%s: Default index for pcifunc=%#x, bcast=%u mcast=%u promise=%u ucast=%u cnt=%u\n",
> > ^^^^^^^
> >
> > Should "promise" be "promisc" here? This appears to be a typo in the debug
> > message.
> ACK.
Hi! FWIW no need to ack all comments per kernel process. Well, at least
on netdev it's not needed. We assume that all review comments will be
addressed by default. Only reply if you have context to add or to argue:)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists