[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176965500835.2326292.18318567298833649268.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 02:50:08 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@....de>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, isolodrai@...a.com,
memxor@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier_bug_if to account for
BPF_CALL
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 12:59:10 +0100 you wrote:
> This fixes the verifier_bug_if() that runs on nospec_result to not trigger
> for BPF_CALL (bug reported by Hu, Mei, and Mu). See patch 1 for a full
> description and patch 2 for a test (based on the PoC from the report).
>
> While working on this I noticed two other problems:
>
> - nospec_result is currently ignored for BPF_CALL during patching, but it
> may be required if we assume the CPU may speculate into/out of functions.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Fix verifier_bug_if to account for BPF_CALL
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cd3b6a3d49f8
- [bpf-next,2/2] bpf: Test nospec after dead stack write in helper
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/60d2c438c1bb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists