Message-ID: <08c3fad6-b881-4089-b081-bde6efbafbd2@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 16:01:33 +0800
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
 Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Koutný
 <mkoutny@...e.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/for-next 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: Introduce a new top level
 isolcpus_update_mutex



On 2026/1/28 12:42, Waiman Long wrote:
> The current cpuset partition code is able to dynamically update
> the sched domains of a running system and the corresponding
> HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask to perform what is essentally the
> "isolcpus=domain,..." boot command line feature at run time.
> 
> The housekeeping cpumask update requires flushing a number of different
> workqueues which may not be safe with cpus_read_lock() held as the
> workqueue flushing code may acquire cpus_read_lock() or acquiring locks
> which have locking dependency with cpus_read_lock() down the chain. Below
> is an example of such circular locking problem.
> 
>   ======================================================
>   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>   6.18.0-test+ #2 Tainted: G S
>   ------------------------------------------------------
>   test_cpuset_prs/10971 is trying to acquire lock:
>   ffff888112ba4958 ((wq_completion)sync_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x7a/0x180
> 
>   but task is already holding lock:
>   ffffffffae47f450 (cpuset_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: cpuset_partition_write+0x85/0x130
> 
>   which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
>   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>   -> #4 (cpuset_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
>   -> #3 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
>   -> #2 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
>   -> #1 ((work_completion)(&arg.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
>   -> #0 ((wq_completion)sync_wq){+.+.}-{0:0}:
> 
>   Chain exists of:
>     (wq_completion)sync_wq --> cpu_hotplug_lock --> cpuset_mutex
> 
>   5 locks held by test_cpuset_prs/10971:
>    #0: ffff88816810e440 (sb_writers#7){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0
>    #1: ffff8891ab620890 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x260/0x5f0
>    #2: ffff8890a78b83e8 (kn->active#187){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2b6/0x5f0
>    #3: ffffffffadf32900 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuset_partition_write+0x77/0x130
>    #4: ffffffffae47f450 (cpuset_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: cpuset_partition_write+0x85/0x130
> 
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>      :
>    touch_wq_lockdep_map+0x93/0x180
>    __flush_workqueue+0x111/0x10b0
>    housekeeping_update+0x12d/0x2d0
>    update_parent_effective_cpumask+0x595/0x2440
>    update_prstate+0x89d/0xce0
>    cpuset_partition_write+0xc5/0x130
>    cgroup_file_write+0x1a5/0x680
>    kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3df/0x5f0
>    vfs_write+0x525/0xfd0
>    ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0
>    do_syscall_64+0x95/0x520
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> 
> To avoid such a circular locking dependency problem, we have to
> call housekeeping_update() without holding the cpus_read_lock()
> and cpuset_mutex. One way to do that is to introduce a new top level
> isolcpus_update_mutex which will be acquired first if the set of isolated
> CPUs may have to be updated. This new isolcpus_update_mutex will provide
> the need mutual exclusion without the need to hold cpus_read_lock().
> 
> As cpus_read_lock() is now no longer held when
> tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask() is called, it needs to acquire it
> directly.
> 
> The lockdep_is_cpuset_held() is also updated to check the new
> isolcpus_update_mutex.
> 

I worry about the issue:

CPU1				CPU2
rmdir
css->ss->css_killed(css);			
cpuset_css_killed
				__update_isolation_cpumasks
				cpuset_full_unlock
css->flags |= CSS_DYING;
css_clear_dir(css);
...
// offline and free do not
// get isolcpus_update_mutex
cpuset_css_offline
cpuset_css_free
				cpuset_full_lock
				...
				// UAF?

> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c        | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  kernel/sched/isolation.c      |  4 +-
>  kernel/time/timer_migration.c |  3 +-
>  3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 98c7cb732206..96390ceb5122 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static cpumask_var_t	subpartitions_cpus;
>  static cpumask_var_t	isolated_cpus;
>  
>  /*
> - * isolated_cpus updating flag (protected by cpuset_mutex)
> + * isolated_cpus updating flag (protected by isolcpus_update_mutex)
>   * Set if isolated_cpus is going to be updated in the current
>   * cpuset_mutex crtical section.
>   */
> @@ -223,29 +223,46 @@ struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> - * There are two global locks guarding cpuset structures - cpuset_mutex and
> - * callback_lock. The cpuset code uses only cpuset_mutex. Other kernel
> - * subsystems can use cpuset_lock()/cpuset_unlock() to prevent change to cpuset
> - * structures. Note that cpuset_mutex needs to be a mutex as it is used in
> - * paths that rely on priority inheritance (e.g. scheduler - on RT) for
> - * correctness.
> + * CPUSET Locking Convention
> + * -------------------------
>   *
> - * A task must hold both locks to modify cpusets.  If a task holds
> - * cpuset_mutex, it blocks others, ensuring that it is the only task able to
> - * also acquire callback_lock and be able to modify cpusets.  It can perform
> - * various checks on the cpuset structure first, knowing nothing will change.
> - * It can also allocate memory while just holding cpuset_mutex.  While it is
> - * performing these checks, various callback routines can briefly acquire
> - * callback_lock to query cpusets.  Once it is ready to make the changes, it
> - * takes callback_lock, blocking everyone else.
> + * Below are the three global locks guarding cpuset structures in lock
> + * acquisition order:
> + *  - isolcpus_update_mutex (optional)
> + *  - cpu_hotplug_lock (cpus_read_lock/cpus_write_lock)
> + *  - cpuset_mutex
> + *  - callback_lock (raw spinlock)
>   *
> - * Calls to the kernel memory allocator can not be made while holding
> - * callback_lock, as that would risk double tripping on callback_lock
> - * from one of the callbacks into the cpuset code from within
> - * __alloc_pages().
> + * The first isolcpus_update_mutex should only be held if the existing set of
> + * isolated CPUs (in isolated partition) or any of the partition states may be
> + * changed when some cpuset control files are being written into. Otherwise,
> + * it can be skipped. Holding isolcpus_update_mutex/cpus_read_lock or
> + * cpus_write_lock will ensure mutual exclusion of isolated_cpus update.
>   *
> - * If a task is only holding callback_lock, then it has read-only
> - * access to cpusets.
> + * As cpuset will now indirectly flush a number of different workqueues in
> + * housekeeping_update() when the set of isolated CPUs is going to be changed,
> + * it may not be safe from the circular locking perspective to hold the
> + * cpus_read_lock. So cpuset_full_lock() will be released before calling
> + * housekeeping_update() and re-acquired afterward.
> + *
> + * A task must hold all the remaining three locks to modify externally visible
> + * or used fields of cpusets, though some of the internally used cpuset fields
> + * can be modified by holding cpu_hotplug_lock and cpuset_mutex only. If only
> + * reliable read access of the externally used fields are needed, a task can
> + * hold either cpuset_mutex or callback_lock.
> + *
> + * If a task holds cpu_hotplug_lock and cpuset_mutex, it blocks others,
> + * ensuring that it is the only task able to also acquire callback_lock and
> + * be able to modify cpusets.  It can perform various checks on the cpuset
> + * structure first, knowing nothing will change. It can also allocate memory
> + * without holding callback_lock. While it is performing these checks, various
> + * callback routines can briefly acquire callback_lock to query cpusets.  Once
> + * it is ready to make the changes, it takes callback_lock, blocking everyone
> + * else.
> + *
> + * Calls to the kernel memory allocator cannot be made while holding
> + * callback_lock which is a spinlock, as the memory allocator may sleep or
> + * call back into cpuset code and acquire callback_lock.
>   *
>   * Now, the task_struct fields mems_allowed and mempolicy may be changed
>   * by other task, we use alloc_lock in the task_struct fields to protect
> @@ -256,6 +273,7 @@ struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
>   * cpumasks and nodemasks.
>   */
>  
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(isolcpus_update_mutex);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpuset_mutex);
>  
>  /**
> @@ -302,7 +320,7 @@ void cpuset_full_unlock(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
>  bool lockdep_is_cpuset_held(void)
>  {
> -	return lockdep_is_held(&cpuset_mutex);
> +	return lockdep_is_held(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -1294,9 +1312,8 @@ static bool prstate_housekeeping_conflict(int prstate, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
>  static void __update_isolation_cpumasks(bool twork);
>  static void isolation_task_work_fn(struct callback_head *cb)
>  {
> -	cpuset_full_lock();
> +	guard(mutex)(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
>  	__update_isolation_cpumasks(true);
> -	cpuset_full_lock();
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1338,8 +1355,18 @@ static void __update_isolation_cpumasks(bool twork)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
> +	/*
> +	 * Release cpus_read_lock & cpuset_mutex before calling
> +	 * housekeeping_update() and re-acquiring them afterward if not
> +	 * calling from task_work.
> +	 */
> +	if (!twork)
> +		cpuset_full_unlock();
>  	ret = housekeeping_update(isolated_cpus);
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
> +	if (!twork)
> +		cpuset_full_lock();
>  
>  	isolated_cpus_updating = false;
>  }
> @@ -3196,6 +3223,7 @@ ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  		return -EACCES;
>  
>  	buf = strstrip(buf);
> +	mutex_lock(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
>  	cpuset_full_lock();
>  	if (!is_cpuset_online(cs))
>  		goto out_unlock;
> @@ -3226,6 +3254,7 @@ ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  		rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
>  out_unlock:
>  	cpuset_full_unlock();
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
>  	if (of_cft(of)->private == FILE_MEMLIST)
>  		schedule_flush_migrate_mm();
>  	return retval ?: nbytes;
> @@ -3329,6 +3358,7 @@ static ssize_t cpuset_partition_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>  	else
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	guard(mutex)(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
>  	cpuset_full_lock();
>  	if (is_cpuset_online(cs))
>  		retval = update_prstate(cs, val);
> @@ -3502,6 +3532,7 @@ static void cpuset_css_killed(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>  {
>  	struct cpuset *cs = css_cs(css);
>  
> +	guard(mutex)(&isolcpus_update_mutex);
>  	cpuset_full_lock();
>  	/* Reset valid partition back to member */
>  	if (is_partition_valid(cs))
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index 3b725d39c06e..ef152d401fe2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *isol_mask)
>  	struct cpumask *trial, *old = NULL;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> -
>  	trial = kmalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!trial)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -136,7 +134,7 @@ int housekeeping_update(struct cpumask *isol_mask)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!housekeeping.flags)
> -		static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden);
> +		static_branch_enable(&housekeeping_overridden);
>  
>  	if (housekeeping.flags & HK_FLAG_DOMAIN)
>  		old = housekeeping_cpumask_dereference(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN);
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
> index 6da9cd562b20..244a8d025e78 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer_migration.c
> @@ -1559,8 +1559,6 @@ int tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask(struct cpumask *exclude_cpumask)
>  	cpumask_var_t cpumask __free(free_cpumask_var) = CPUMASK_VAR_NULL;
>  	int cpu;
>  
> -	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> -
>  	if (!works)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
> @@ -1570,6 +1568,7 @@ int tmigr_isolated_exclude_cpumask(struct cpumask *exclude_cpumask)
>  	 * First set previously isolated CPUs as available (unisolate).
>  	 * This cpumask contains only CPUs that switched to available now.
>  	 */
> +	guard(cpus_read_lock)();
>  	cpumask_andnot(cpumask, cpu_online_mask, exclude_cpumask);
>  	cpumask_andnot(cpumask, cpumask, tmigr_available_cpumask);
>  

-- 
Best regards,
Ridong

Powered by blists - more mailing lists