[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXs09b7Q8wmHMFNQ@thinkstation>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:35:20 +0000
From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>
To: "Pratik R. Sampat" <prsampat@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, ardb@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...nel.org,
osalvador@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, michael.roth@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/memory_hotplug: Add support to accept memory
during hot-add
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 02:41:04PM -0600, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
> Confidential computing guests require memory to be accepted before use.
> The unaccepted memory bitmap maintained by firmware does not track
> most hotplugged memory ranges apart from system memory annotated to be
> cold plugged at boot.
>
> Explicitly validate and transition the newly added memory to a private
> state, making it usable by the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@....com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mm.h | 5 +++++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
> index c2c067eff634..5a4c8b0f56c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,24 @@ bool range_contains_unaccepted_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Unaccepted memory bitmap only covers initial boot memory and not the
> + * hotpluggable range that is part of SRAT parsing. However, some initial memory
> + * with the attribute EFI_MEMORY_HOT_PLUGGABLE can indicate boot time memory
> + * that can be hot-removed. Hence, handle acceptance in accordance with the
> + * unaccepted bitmap. Otherwise, perform the state change for the memory range
> + * up-front.
> + */
> +void accept_hotplug_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size)
> +{
> + if (range_contains_unaccepted_memory(start, size)) {
> + accept_memory(start, size);
> + return;
> + }
No. This is buggy. The memory has to be accepted regardless of state in
the bitmap. If the memory is ever unplugged the bitmap state is not
relevant.
So, accept it unconditionally and mark the memory accepted in the
bitmap.
> +
> + arch_accept_memory(start, start + size);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE
> static bool unaccepted_memory_vmcore_pfn_is_ram(struct vmcore_cb *cb,
> unsigned long pfn)
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 15076261d0c2..2d3c1ea40606 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -4504,6 +4504,7 @@ int set_anon_vma_name(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
>
> bool range_contains_unaccepted_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size);
> void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size);
> +void accept_hotplug_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size);
>
> #else
>
> @@ -4517,6 +4518,10 @@ static inline void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size)
> {
> }
>
> +static inline void accept_hotplug_memory(phys_addr_t start, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +}
> +
> #endif
>
> static inline bool pfn_is_unaccepted_memory(unsigned long pfn)
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index a63ec679d861..549ccfd190ee 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1567,6 +1567,8 @@ int add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
> if (!strcmp(res->name, "System RAM"))
> firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size, "System RAM");
>
> + accept_hotplug_memory(start, size);
> +
> /* device_online() will take the lock when calling online_pages() */
> mem_hotplug_done();
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists