[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <zzgnirkreq5r57favstiuxuc66ep3npassqgcymntrttgttt3c@g4pi4l2bvi6q>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 15:26:14 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, mizhang@...gle.com,
sandipan.das@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: x86/pmu: Refresh Host-Only/Guest-Only
eventsel at nested transitions
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 03:28:08PM -0800, Jim Mattson wrote:
> Add amd_pmu_refresh_host_guest_eventsel_hw() to recalculate eventsel_hw for
> all PMCs based on the current vCPU state. This is needed because Host-Only
> and Guest-Only counters must be enabled/disabled at:
>
> - SVME changes: When EFER.SVME is modified, counters with Guest-Only bits
> need their hardware enable state updated.
>
> - Nested transitions: When entering or leaving guest mode, Host-Only
> counters should be disabled/enabled and Guest-Only counters should be
> enabled/disabled accordingly.
>
> Introduce svm_enter_guest_mode() and svm_leave_guest_mode() wrappers that
> call enter_guest_mode()/leave_guest_mode() followed by the PMU refresh,
> ensuring the PMU state stays synchronized with guest mode transitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 6 +++---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> index de90b104a0dd..a7d1901f256b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
> nested_svm_transition_tlb_flush(vcpu);
>
> /* Enter Guest-Mode */
> - enter_guest_mode(vcpu);
> + svm_enter_guest_mode(vcpu);
FWIW, I think this name is a bit confusing because we also have
enter_svm_guest_mode(). So we end up with:
enter_svm_guest_mode() -> nested_vmcb02_prepare_control() ->
svm_enter_guest_mode() -> enter_guest_mode()
I actually have another proposed change [1] that moves
enter_guest_mode() directly into enter_svm_guest_mode(), so the sequence
would end up being:
enter_svm_guest_mode() -> svm_enter_guest_mode() -> enter_guest_mode()
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260115011312.3675857-9-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists