[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vb2xas75xigzauqkfey7amtb6ux5oz4vnfxx7u7oks3nzbggy7@eaheqgwtwa34>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 11:42:49 -0500
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
Aishwarya.TCV@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 22/29] maple_tree: Use maple copy node for
mas_wr_rebalance() operation
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> [260127 18:16]:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 23:05:48 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 11:45:19AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > > Stop using the maple big node for rebalance operations by changing to
> > > more align with spanning store. The rebalance operation needs its own
> > > data calculation in rebalance_data().
> > >
> > > In the event of too much data, the rebalance tries to push the data
> > > using push_data_sib(). If there is insufficient data, the rebalance
> > > operation will rebalance against a sibling (found with rebalance_sib()).
> >
> > I'm seeing a test failure in the LTP linkat02 test on arm64 which we're
> > also seeing on a range of platforms in the Arm lab. A NULL pointer
> > deference is generated handling the syscall in the updated code (log for
> > the actual next-20260126 commit):
>
> Cool, thanks.
>
> Liam, I'll move this series back into mm-new to avoid disrupting
> linux-next testing.
>
>
I know you like fixup patches on larger sets, but I've done three things
to the patch set now:
1. A small fix for this issue
2. Added a new test in its own patch for this issue
3. Cleaned up the old compiler pointer warning in a more readable way
Would you like me to send the delta or a new patch set?
Thanks,
Liam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists