[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=OL1Lt88tToA7pxDAJ4QkxV=PpGZ0zAVD=oexQbEArEZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 15:53:20 -0800
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To: Kanchana P Sridhar <kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev, usamaarif642@...il.com,
ryan.roberts@....com, 21cnbao@...il.com, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org, sj@...nel.org,
kasong@...cent.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, clabbe@...libre.com, ardb@...nel.org,
ebiggers@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, kristen.c.accardi@...el.com,
vinicius.gomes@...el.com, giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com,
wajdi.k.feghali@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 24/26] mm: zswap: Consistently use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to
check acomp_ctx resources.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 7:36 PM Kanchana P Sridhar
<kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in zswap_cpu_comp_prepare() to check for valid
> acomp/req, making it consistent with acomp_ctx_dealloc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kanchana P Sridhar <kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
LGTM. I wonder if this is technically a fix?
Also, considering submitting this separately if the patch series stall
- so that you don't have to carry one extra patch around every time :)
Anyway:
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists