[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260130032517.173590-1-n7l8m4@u.northwestern.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 03:25:17 +0000
From: Ziyi Guo <n7l8m4@...orthwestern.edu>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>
Cc: Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ziyi Guo <n7l8m4@...orthwestern.edu>
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: mt76: add missing lock protection in mt76_sta_state for sta_event callback
mt76_sta_state() calls the sta_event callback without holding dev->mutex.
However, mt7915_mac_sta_event() (MT7915 implementation of this callback)
calls mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow() which has
lockdep_assert_held(&dev->mt76.mutex) indicating that callers must
hold this lock.
The locking pattern in mt76_sta_state() is inconsistent:
- mt76_sta_add() acquires dev->mutex before calling dev->drv->sta_add
- mt76_sta_remove() acquires dev->mutex before calling __mt76_sta_remove
- But sta_event callback is called without acquiring the lock
Add mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() around the sta_event callback invocation
to fix the missing lock protection and maintain consistency with the
existing locking pattern.
Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <n7l8m4@...orthwestern.edu>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c
index 75772979f438..468bc176bacb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mac80211.c
@@ -1640,6 +1640,7 @@ int mt76_sta_state(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
struct mt76_phy *phy = hw->priv;
struct mt76_dev *dev = phy->dev;
enum mt76_sta_event ev;
+ int ret;
phy = mt76_vif_phy(hw, vif);
if (!phy)
@@ -1668,7 +1669,11 @@ int mt76_sta_state(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
else
return 0;
- return dev->drv->sta_event(dev, vif, sta, ev);
+ mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+ ret = dev->drv->sta_event(dev, vif, sta, ev);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt76_sta_state);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists