[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59101a15-fa63-4948-9169-3db6596bf618@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:20:43 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...0n.name, jiaxun.yang@...goat.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, arnd@...db.de, x86@...nel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
vulab@...as.ac.cn, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
dakr@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] LoongArch: Make cpumask_of_node() robust against
NUMA_NO_NODE
On 25/01/2026 03:55, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Thanks
So can a loongarch maintainer pick this up please?
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 5:48 PM John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> The arch definition of cpumask_of_node() cannot handle NUMA_NO_NODE - which
>> is a valid index - so add a check for this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h
>> index f06e7ff25bb7c..6b79d6183085a 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h
>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>>
>> extern cpumask_t cpus_on_node[];
>>
>> -#define cpumask_of_node(node) (&cpus_on_node[node])
>> +#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == NUMA_NO_NODE ? cpu_all_mask : &cpus_on_node[node])
>>
>> struct pci_bus;
>> extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *);
>> --
>> 2.43.5
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists