[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXy5U7XJSoSG5HpE@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:59:47 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, chrisl@...nel.org,
kasong@...cent.com, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix use-after-free in swap due to
stale page data after split_page()
On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 06:49:00PM +0500, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> + /*
> + * Split pages may contain stale data from previous use. Initialize
> + * page->private and page->lru which may have LIST_POISON values.
> + */
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
> + for (i = 1; i < (1 << order); i++) {
> + set_page_private(page + i, 0);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page[i].lru);
> + }
> +
> for (i = 1; i < (1 << order); i++)
> set_page_refcounted(page + i);
> split_page_owner(page, order, 0);
Why add a second loop instead of using the existing one?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists