[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260130092329.23ee13f9@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:23:29 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] tracing/Documentation: Add a section about
backup instance
On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 22:24:49 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > +
> > > +When the boot up, the previous data in the`boot_map` is copied to "backup"
> >
> > s/When the boot up/On boot up/ copied to the "backup"
>
> Ah, thanks,
>
> >
> > > +instance, and the "sched:*" and "irq:*" events for current boot are traced on
> >
> > for the current boot are traced in
> >
> >
> > > +"boot_map". Thus user can read the previous boot data from the "backup" instance
>
> ^ the "boot_map".
Nope ;-) In this case, leaving out the "the" is appropriate. Now you would
need article if it was: the "boot_map" instance
But because you left out "instance" you don't need the article, as
"boot_map" is a name of an object and doesn't need the article when used by
itself.
You wouldn't use an article with:
The code was written by Steven.
But you would if you said:
The code was written by the Steven person.
;-)
> >
> > Definite articles are a pain ;-)
As I said. Definite articles in English are a pain ;)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists