[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qmnovgzw6wqmeyt44q6rrhj5zwovnwv2q6q5tpuw6k3oj7e3mq@c6tvf2yaodhg>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 09:04:12 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita.agarwal@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@....qualcomm.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] media: iris: introduce SM8350 and SC8280XP support
On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 06:50:35PM +0530, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
>
>
> On 1/26/2026 4:25 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 10:50:56AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> On 1/25/26 4:32 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> SM8350 and SC8280XP have an updated version of the Iris2 core also
> >>> present on the SM8250 and SC7280 platforms. Add necessary platform data
> >>> to utilize the core on those two platforms.
> >>>
> >>> The iris_platform_gen1.c is now compiled unconditionally, even if Venus
> >>> driver is enabled, but SM8250 and SC7280 are still disabled in
> >>> iris_dt_match.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> +static void iris_set_sm8350_preset_registers(struct iris_core *core)
> >>> +{
> >>> + u32 val;
> >>> +
> >>> + val = readl(core->reg_base + 0xb0088);
> >>> + val &= ~0x11;
> >>> + writel(val, core->reg_base + 0xb0088);
> >>
> >> Can we "open-source" what this write does?
> >
> > I'd leave this question to Vikash. Hopefully he can comment if I can
> > open these bits or not.
>
> This register controls the clock halt states for several IRIS sub‑cores.
> A bit value of 1 halts the clock, and 0 enables it.
> During power‑on, we clear bits 0 and 4 to unhalt/enable the corresponding
> core clocks.
I think, Konrad's question was if we can add a #define for the register
name and maybe fore the mask bits. If we can, I can make it a part of
the patchset (I don't think there should be an issue with the register
name).
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists